As the problem if decides in the recital of the aesthetic judgment in the free game and the harmony of the facultieses spirituals that we have and that the object in us produces. The effect of this game it exempts of the facultieses is the judgment of the taste. Therefore, this purely objective judgment precedes the pleasure for the object, basing it for the harmony of the facultieses to know. However, such universal subjective validation of the pleasure, on to the object for the beauty concept, is only based on the universality of the subjective conditions of the judgment of objects. Together with the beauty it comes the sublime one that also it is what pleases by itself.
The difference between beautiful sublime if of the one in the fact of that the first one if relates to the form of the object, characterized for the limitation (or delimitation). The sublime one says respect what it is informs, what it implies the representation of what he is limitless. The beauty produces a pleasure positive, sublime a negative pleasure. The sublime one is not in the things, but in the man. It is presented under two forms: dynamic mathematician and. Mathematician when given by the infinitely great one (ean, sky etc.). Dynamic when data for the infinitely powerful one (earthquakes, volcanos etc.).
Ahead of the two the man if it discovers small jammed e, but it discovers that it is superior to the immensely great or immensely powerful one, therefore loads in itself the ideas of the reason (of the absolute totality) that they surpass what it seemed to surpass the proper man. TELEOLOGIC JUDGMENT the aesthetic judgment possesss a subjective purpose. The teleologic judgment, on the other hand, presents a purpose that depends on the nature. Part of the Critical one of the judgment college is complicated, therefore many consideraes tend to take the philosopher to the metaphysics, repelled in its preconceptions since first the Critical one.
"One idea to create our entire reality, all the higher and lower, until the public the final correction. This single idea – the source and substance of all actions, it sets the target and it gives meaning to the efforts she is reality – the perfection of all the long-awaited reward. " Baal Sulam, "Teachings of the ten Sefirot" Question: In the near future in Europe is planned to conduct an experiment in which thousands of physicists from around the world try to simulate the situation that arose immediately after the Big Bang. They reproduce the event by the collider – very powerful particle accelerator. The purpose of the experiment – to find the particle from which the universe was created.
What do you as a Kabbalist can say about this? What do you think they see? Michael Laitman: I can not now give a lesson in perception of reality and tell us how we affect the surrounding reality as it changes under impact of our thoughts. I can only say that scientists are only more confusing particle from which the universe was created, will not be disclosed because it is not material. Ron Beit is likely to increase your knowledge. That spark, and everything around it has grown – it is our selfishness. He kept growing and growing, and this increase is perceived by us as the evolution of the universe within, say, fifteen billion years. But what happened fifteen billion years ago? Who can argue that all happened exactly as we describe? Because we are so arranged that, in our perception of a sense of time, motion and space, in accordance with this we perceive the universe. But this picture is imaginary. It is only because it so I play my mechanism of perception of reality.
This is not the true picture. It seems to us that the world exists outside of us, but in reality it is only the picture painted in our brain. Scientists in this issue have reached the end point. They can not penetrate farther because of the limitations of our five senses. Need to 'climb' over them, and scientists are not capable of this. Only Kabbalah teaches us how way to develop a sixth sense and experience the reality of time, motion and space. And this is not the reality that I perceive now, after five bodily senses or with instruments that only extend the range of our perception. To talk about what happened before the Big Bang, you must 'climb' over them, to go beyond our present perception and objectively look at the universe and everything exists. Kabbalah – the physics of the Upper world, which is a source of energy and matter. But scientists are studying the phenomenon, using the physics of our world, and therefore did not find. They once again reach a deadlock. We see that this happens in Quantum physics: a touch of something and see that nothing more can not catch. This is because from here and then there is an entrance only for the science of Kabbalah. Michael Laitman
But I know that all being takes off its origin of it, if it is well of sombras' ' . After that of the emphasis to the limits of the thought. In which if it treats in educating, therefore when more it is educated little if understands the fog that cause fear and that makes to shine the night and is in this then that consists the mstica in Morin, based in the knowledge: I feel ' ' misticamente' ' the moment in which the knowledge it discharges in the ignorance, in which knowing discharges in the mystery. At the same time, rationally I am convinced of that, when, but our science advances, but it comes close itself to the Inconhecvel. But I do not give to this Inconhecvel the name of God. Here, still, I join my demon of the rationality with the one of the mstica. We can observe that the author if feels mstico when the knowledge discharges in the ignorance.
This means that from the moment that if believes that it knows, but in the end if it knows and then it meets with the ignorance and it makes with that knowing if chains with the mystery. Morin affirms that science is advancing and this advance leads for the Inconhecvel, that is, walks for what it is not known. But it leaves clearly that this Inconhecvel is not God. Finally it declares that its thought still is in conflict with the mstica. It believes that this is bad when demon of the rationality, therefore creates an obstacle to come close itself to the misticismo. With this we can say that the mstica is not only exclusive of the religion. Edgar Morin says that the mstico phenomenon is not monopoly of the classic religions, the ones that claim the existence of God. affirms: It exists, also, in the secular religions.
The years pass, is the life, when you think that you can now dedicate yourself to be happy your mind begins to have live memories to be able to feel happiness, moments of laughter, hugs, beautiful words, shared games, illusions, of innocence, shared dreams, respect, communication, tips and everything because unexpectedly the joy faded. Everything that you expect crumbles, everything changes without realizing, everything becomes dark and leave recognize him, you want to find him, you want him to recover and not only by it, by a selfish instinct, but by himself. Took you my being for nine months and that made that we are United for the rest of our lives by a special tie, surely color green hope. I know that he suffers, know that inside you feel disappointment with himself, but he is so proud that does not want help, prefers to deceive and thinking that since you want you can again become who he was, that since you want it may again become free and happy without having to rely on a substance, prefers thinking that he has no problem. To be a sensitive person brings many problems, he is, how having been as smart fails to be making the decision to steer his life, not wants to do and he alone is one who has to decide this. A truncated life, a life without goals, an empty life, without illusions. How many sleepless nights looking for an answer to so many questions in my head and in my heart, why, what was the moment that took that road, in what I have failed, perhaps our righteousness was actually harmful in their education, would have been better that I had consumed so that he did not and I say this because I’ve done that question at times knowing people who consume and have to its around to children than they do not.
What I want to say? The philosophical speech capsized or seems to have if only become enlightening of terms and a one to assist of luxury of other speeches when one or another one part of the speech seems not to incase or to have the ideal floreio. It is not had as to know if it has to see with the stagnation and if to come back toward inside of itself of much of the philosophy that is said ' ' to give certo' ' that one only left of the problems of the world arguing in its symposiums and meeting and giving opinions and creating folloied disputes only in specialized magazines. Taking off few examples in Brazil as of the professor Pablo Ghiraldelli Jr and Susana de Castro between very little others we do not have philosophy appearing in the media nor for good nor for badly not being with the controversial project, and just, by the way, to try to give the last degree of responsibility to the philosophy: or if it becomes a profession as all the others and of the practical answers the society or diminishes and it disappears of time in its constellation of professors and researchers whom they write to only publish for its pairs. Without entailing some to the media, when it is only the case, and without popular penetration because it speaks of useless problems to the majority of the population clearly that seems not to import itself accurately with what it is the end of the man, but that men beat in women and reflect violence behind violence without no respect and consideration. But it does not have philosophical teses on this, therefore the Philosophy still considers bedding of thought and with captive place to ruminate everything that other sciences already had thought. Of the second half of century XX until the immense majority of the thinkers detached in the rinces of the philosophy they had today denied epteto philosopher and this has a reason.