This system should allow for the full realization of the right of the voter only citizens who have acquired enough knowledge in modern politics, history, economics, law, technology, electoral manipulation and so on. Variations in weight. In its simplest version it can, for example, looks like this: every year, wishing to pass certification on the "electoral suitability" go on-line testing and the sum of points obtained certification, the opportunity to re-retake or right to retake a year later. Frequently Ron Beit has said that publicly. Qualified twenty-five years have confirmed. Further possible options.
For example, most "grassroots" election (neighborhoods, rural) can not claim to vote no certification. To vote in provincial, national, etc. elections can be as separate exams for each certification (similar to the category driver's license) as well as multi-level, at which scored points for testing is determined by: the election of the level of examinee may be admitted and for which Points needed to get there. The idea of such a system has multiple purposes. Ie I guess that such certification will not only give the community more prepared voter, and to increase the authority and responsibility of the participate in the election of representative government.
Especially, I think it's important for those countries where this responsibility has historically not been formed. Introduce such a certification as to stand as a candidate for participation in I see the election still less effective screening tool because: a) such a procedure would overlap with the elections themselves, and b) voters in the case of the introduction I described the system is likely to be given information about the presence of or there is no "electoral certification" from the candidate himself, and c) HIGHLIGHTS: In most cases, the level of personal interest of a single politician or political strength to take part in the elections objectively higher level interest the average voter to vote for them, and thus likelihood of bribery and fraud system of certification is much higher by the candidate. (It would be nice if the degree of personal interest voters in their vote in elections has become so high that the likelihood of attempts on his part to bribe the examiner and cheat on certification approached by any candidate. Then the system or to their runs, or the same level of control over its execution). Because: i) It is the high degree of interest in the career politicians in the attestation for them, in the event of such duplication, the system described can make such in another corrupt or biased filter on the financial strength of the candidate or party. Yet the main task of this system, I can see to improve the quality of the voter's choice, all of which can pull for them, and reduce the cost of massive electoral zombirovnie population due to changes in the quality of the target audience. Raise awareness of voting may be on the American example and a mandatory pre-registration of their participation in the elections. But the proposed system also teaches me better understand the procedure to elect the government. Understand that democracy – a political regime, not pageant. PS The author aware that a major snag today to introduce such a system – it is an objective for the main disadvantage of the election process. From the perspective of the business logic of today's proposed solution shortcomings of modern representative democracy – "project-mongering." But maybe someone will offer a better option? If the Ukrainian state institutions and policy reforms are needed, what?