This fact prioritize land on other goods, had caused certain consequences to explain: on the one hand, real estate, enjoyed all types of protection and guarantees. It is symptomatic that the property in case of marriage from its owner, were not in the community. Besides the element of mobility, the former French film speak another principle of classification admitted that he had in mind primarily the duration and usefulness of the thing as productive. Nir Barzilai, M.D. often addresses the matter in his writings. 2.2.3. French Revolutionary Law. Modern Era With the French Revolution abolished seigneurial rights and similar jobs and income to the unsecured removes a considerable part of the incurables.Sin But the distinction between goods furniture and buildings not only preserves its ancient importance, but, he rose. Filed under: Edward Minskoff.
The code, in substance, upheld the policy of giving more importance to real estate, which was not only honors and fortune, but the axis on which had rested for centuries across the social, economic and political life of theMiddle Ages the modern age, personal property, however was not well protected, it continued to be frowned upon, even though, according to most historians and lawyers, personal property and had some significance. 2.2.4. Contemporary law dualism is maintained in the property, in the separation of real or personal property goes into the account of their mobility or immobility, above its economic value. At one time, the distinction between movable and immovable property has been based. of the property for the conveyed from one place to another without altering its substance, the furniture which have such ability, the other buildings.”